Bengi BaydanThe food industry is a highly competitive market where businesses aim to establish their own brand and reputation. Trademarks play a significant role in this by allowing businesses to protect their unique logos, names, and other identifying elements from being used by others.

In this article, we will examine the similarities between two food brands, McDonald’s and Mr. Charlie’s, and explore the potential trademark law issues that may arise. In order to have a deeper understanding about the topic, you will find logos of these two trademarks.

McDonald's v. Mr Charlie's


What is the actual threat?

As anyone can see the similarity between color combination and typing style, Mr Charlie’s may be a threat to world wide-known brand McDonald’s.

First and foremost, we try to understand what is protected in Trademark law. Trademark law is designed to protect the unique elements that distinguish one brand from another. In order to obtain trademark protection, a brand must be distinctive and not similar to existing trademarks. A trademark may be registered with the government to provide the brand owner with exclusive rights to use the trademark in commerce.

The importance of trademark distinctiveness

In the food industry, it is common for businesses to use similar colors, designs, and product names to attract customers. One may think that “red” is quite often in food &restaurants and a color cannot be allocated to only one company. However, when two brands are too similar, it can cause confusion among consumers and lead to trademark infringement or dilution. In order to prevent this, the brand owner must take precautions as changing the color combination, typing style, figures etc.

A comparison on essential parts of trademarks

McDonald’s is a well-known fast-food chain that has been around for decades. The brand is easily recognizable by its iconic golden arches and red and yellow color scheme. McDonald’s is also famous for its Big Mac sandwich.

On the other hand, Mr. Charlie’s is a vegan restaurant that offers plant-based burgers and other menu items, based in Los Angeles. According to its website (, Mr. Charlie’s aims to provide customers with “great tasting and affordable plant-based options.” The brand also uses a red and yellow color scheme, and offers a sandwich called the Big Chuck.

The similarities between McDonald’s and Mr. Charlie’s are striking. Both brands operate in the same industry, use similar colors, and offer similar products. The fact that Mr. Charlie’s also uses a name that is similar to McDonald’s adds to the confusion among consumers. When a consumer sees the Mr. Charlie’s trademark, they are likely to associate it with McDonald’s.

Potential trademark infringement and dilution

The similarities between McDonald’s and Mr. Charlie’s raise questions about potential trademark infringement and dilution. Trademark infringement occurs when one brand uses another brand’s trademark without permission. In addition, the trademarks do not have to be the same but must contain a particular amount of similarity which ultimately affects the consumer. In this case, Mr. Charlie’s may be using elements that are similar to McDonald’s’ trademark in a way that is likely to cause confusion among consumers.

In addition, trademark dilution occurs when a brand’s trademark is used in a way that weakens its distinctiveness. This can occur when a brand’s trademark is used in a manner that is similar to another brand’s trademark. In this case, Mr. Charlie’s use of a red and yellow color scheme and a sandwich named Big Chuck may dilute the distinctiveness of McDonald’s’ trademark.

Additionally, it’s important to recognize that McDonald’s holds an unparalleled position in the food industry. It’s possible that Mr. Charlie’s may seek to capitalize on Mc Donald’s widespread recognition. This approach is common in marketing, but it can raise trademark law issues.


In conclusion, the similarities between McDonald’s and Mr. Charlie’s raise important questions about trademark law in the food industry. While both brands are entitled to protect their unique elements, they must also respect the trademark rights of others. It remains to be seen whether McDonald’s will take action against Mr. Charlie’s for potential trademark infringement and dilution. However, it is clear Mr. Charlie’s may affect McDonald’s’ reputation and popularity.

Written by Bengi Baydan LL.M., IP Law Consultant & Attorney At Law


Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Our weekly newsletter is exclusively based on trademarks, instead of a generic IP newsletter! We also will be including a selection of the top articles from The Trademark Lawyermagazine. Please enter your details below to be included in our mailing list.

You have Successfully Subscribed!